Yorubas Are The Problem With Nigeria – Lamido Sanusi
By Sanusi Lamido Sanusi
Comments: Leave a comment In sum,
the Yoruba political leadership, as mentioned by Balarabe Musa, has shown
itself over the years to be incapable of rising above narrow tribal interests
and reciprocating goodwill from other sections of the country by treating other
groups with respect. Practically every crisis in Nigeria since independence has
its roots in this attitude. The Yoruba elite and area-boy politics; Igbo
marginalisation and the responsible limits of retribution; and The Yoruba
Factor and “Area-boy” Politics. My views on the Yoruba political leadership
have been thoroughly articulated in some of my writings, prime among which was
” Afenifere: Syllabus of Errors” published by This Day (The Sunday Newspaper)
on Sept 27, 1998. There was also an earlier publication in the weekly Trust
entitled ” The Igbo, the Yoruba and History” (Aug. 21, 1998). In sum, the
Yoruba political leadership, as mentioned by Balarabe Musa, has shown itself
over the years to be incapable of rising above narrow tribal interests and
reciprocating goodwill from other sections of the country by treating other
groups with respect. Practically every crisis in Nigeria since independence has
its roots in this attitude. The Yoruba elite were the first, in 1962, to
attempt a violent overthrow of an elected government in this country. In 1966,
it was the violence in the West which provided an avenue for the putsch of 15th
January. After Chief Awolowo lost to Shagari in 1983 elections, it was the
discontent and bad publicity in the South-West which led to the Buhari
intervention. When Buhari jailed UPN governors like Ige and Onabanjo, the
South-Western press castigated that good government and provided the right mood
for IBB to take over power. As soon as IBB cleared UPN governors of charges
against them in a politically motivated retrial, he became the darling of the
South-West. When IBB annulled the primaries in which Adamu Ciroma and Shehu Yar
Adua emerged as presidential candidates in the NRC and SDP, he was hailed by
the South-West. When the same man annulled the June 12, 1993 elections in which
Abiola was the front-runner, the South-West now became defenders of democracy.
When it seemed Sani Abacha was sympathetic to Abiola, the South-West supported
his take-over. He was in fact invited by a prominent NADECO member to take over
in a published letter shortly before the event. Even though Abiola had won the
elections in the North, the North was blamed for its annulment. When Abdulsalam
Abubakar started his transition, the Yoruba political leadership through NADECO
presented a memorandum on a Government of National Unity that showed complete
disrespect for the intelligence and liberties of other Nigerians.
Meanwhile, nothing has been
negotiated for the children of Abiola, the focus of Yoruba political activity.
In return for these favours, the AD solidly voted for Evan Enwerem as Senate
President. This is a man who participated in the two-million- man March for
Abacha´s self-succession. He also is reputed to have hosted a meeting of
governors during IBB´s transition, demanding that June 12 elections should
never be de-annulled and threatening that the East would go to war if this was
done. When Ibrahim Salisu Buhari was accused of swearing to a false affidavit, the
Yoruba political elite correctly took up the gauntlet for his resignation. When
an AD governor, Bola Tinubu, swears to a false affidavit that he attended an
Ivy League University which he did not attend, we hear excuses. For so many
years, the Yoruba have inundated this country with stories of being
marginalised and of a civil service dominated by northerners through quota
system. The Federal Character Commission has recently released a report which
shows that the South-West accounts for 27.8% of civil servants in the range
GL08 to GL14 and a full 29.5% of GL 15 and above. One zone out of six zones
controls a full 30% of the civil service leaving the other five zones to share
the remaining 70%. We find the same story in the economy, in academia, in parastatals.
Yet in spite of being so dominant, the Yoruba complained and complained of
marginalization. Of recent, in recognition of the trauma which hit the
South-West after June 12, the rest of the country forced everyone out of the
race to ensure that a South-Westerner emerged, often against the best advice of
political activists. Instead of leading a path of reconciliation and strong
appreciation, the Yoruba have embarked on short-sighted triumphalism,
threatening other “nationalities” that they ( who after all lost the election)
will protect Obasanjo ( who was forced on them). No less a person than Bola Ige
has made such utterances. To further show that they were in charge, they led a
cult into the Hausa area of Sagamu, murdered a Hausa woman and nothing happened.
In the violence that followed, they killed several Hausa residents, with Yoruba
leaders like Segun Osoba, reminding Nigerians of the need to respect the
culture of their host communities. This would have continued were it not for
the people of Kano who showed that they could also create their own Oro who
would only be appeased through the shedding of innocent Yoruba blood. I say all
this, to support Balarabe Musa´s statement, that the greatest problem to
nation-building in Nigeria are the Yoruba Bourgeoisie. I say this also to
underscore my point that until they change this attitude, no conference can
solve the problems of Nigeria. We cannot move forward if the leadership of one
of the largest ethnic groups continues to operate, not like statesmen, but like
common area boys. iii.The Igbo Factor and the Reasonable Limits of Retribution.
The Igbo people of Nigeria have made
a mark in the history of this nation. They led the first successful military
coup which eliminated the Military and Political leaders of other regions while
letting off Igbo leaders. Nwafor Orizu, then Senate President, in consultation
with President Azikiwe, subverted the constitution and handed over power to
Aguiyi-Ironsi. Subsequent developments, including attempts at humiliating other
peoples, led to the counter-coup and later the civil war. The Igbos themselves
must acknowledge that they have a large part of the blame for shattering the
unity of this country. Having said that, this nation must realise that Igbos
have more than paid for their foolishness. They have been defeated in war,
rendered paupers by monetary policy fiat, their properties declared abandoned and
confiscated, kept out of strategic public sector appointments and deprived of
public services. The rest of the country forced them to remain in Nigeria and
has continued to deny them equity. The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba
Bourgeoisie have conspired to keep the Igbo out of the scheme of things. In the
recent transition when the Igbo solidly supported the PDP in the hope of an
Ekwueme presidency, the North and South-West treated this as a Biafra agenda.
Every rule set for the primaries, every gentleman´s agreement was set aside to
ensure that Obasanjo, not Ekwueme emerged as the candidate. Things went as far
as getting the Federal Government to hurriedly gazette a pardon. Now, with this
government, the marginalistion of the Igbo is more complete than ever before.
The Igbos have taken all these quietly because, they reason, they brought it
upon themselves. But the nation is sitting on a time-bomb. After the First
World War, the victors treated Germany with the same contempt Nigeria is
treating Igbos. Two decades later, there was a Second World War, far costlier
than the first. Germany was again defeated, but this time, they won a more
honourable peace. Our present political leaders have no sense of History. There
is a new Igbo man, who was not born in 1966 and neither knows nor cares about
Nzeogwu and Ojukwu. There are Igbo men on the street who were never Biafrans.
They were born Nigerians, are Nigerians, but suffer because of actions of
earlier generations. They will soon decide that it is better to fight their own
war, and may be find an honourable peace, than to remain in this contemptible
state in perpetuity. The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba Bourgeoisie have
exacted their pound of flesh from the Igbos. For one Sardauna, one Tafawa
Balewa, one Akintola and one Okotie-Eboh, hundreds of thousands have died and
suffered. If this issue is not addressed immediately, no conference will solve
Nigeria´s problems.
Comments
Post a Comment